Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Greenworks GPW3000 and the Greenworks GPW2700.
But before checking out explanations regarding their power, design, and features here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 pressure washers:
| Greenworks GPW3000 | Greenworks GPW2700 |
|---|---|
 |  |
|
|
| Buy on Amazon (opens in a new tab) | Buy on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
Show all offers | Show all offers |
Power Comparison
- Fuel: Both units are corded electric pressure washers, offering the convenience of continuous power without the need for refueling or recharging, ideal for longer cleaning sessions.
- Engine & Pump: Axial-type pumps are utilized in both the Greenworks GPW3000 and the Greenworks GPW2700, appreciated for their lightweight structure and user-friendly nature. In both instances, the pump operates with a 14-amp motor.
The following charts are provided to show you at a glance how the main specs of the Greenworks GPW3000 compare to the Greenworks GPW2700.
- Pressure: With a maximum pressure of 3000 PSI, the Greenworks GPW3000 exerts a higher force to effectively blast away dirt and grime, outshining the 2700 PSI of the Greenworks GPW2700.
- Water Flow: When running at low pressure, the GPW2700 generates a noticeably higher water output than the GPW3000. With a capacity of up to 2.3 GPM (gallons per minute) compared to the GPW3000's maximum flow of 2 GPM, it should allow for dirt and debris removal with quite greater effectiveness.
- Cleaning Power: Given the negligible variance in Cleaning Units between the Greenworks GPW3000 and the GPW2700 (3300 and 3240 CU, respectively), it's evident that both devices deliver comparable overall cleaning performance.
Design Comparison
- Design: Both units are designed with a wheelbarrow-inspired configuration. Therefore, if one of these devices offers superior mobility, it would likely be attributed to factors such as its wheels and weight, which are discussed further below.
- Design: Both units are designed with a wheelbarrow-inspired configuration. Therefore, if one of these devices offers superior mobility, it would likely be attributed to factors such as its wheels and weight, which are discussed further below.
- Weight: The identical weight of 47 lbs for both pressure washers ensures uniform portability, making them equally convenient options for users to transport during cleaning tasks.
- Maneuverability: Both products benefit from a set of wheels, which greatly contributes to their maneuverability. Featuring a reversible handle, both products aim to improve your grip, providing enhanced comfort and control during maneuvering or transportation.
Feature Comparison
- Soap Addition: Both washers provide the option to include chemical detergent solutions in the water, enhancing their cleaning effectiveness. With both the GPW3000 and the GPW2700, you have the advantage of onboard soap tank, offering a practical solution for storing your cleaning chemicals right within the unit.
- Trigger Gun & Wand: Each of these 2 units comes with a fairly standard ergonomic trigger gun and a classic wand.
- Nozzles: Out of the box, the GPW2700 and the GPW3000 each provide a bundle of 5 nozzles for your convenience. Both products offer the exact same selection of nozzles: 15°, 25°, 40°, soap, and a turbo nozzle.
- Reach: The inclusion of a 25 ft high-pressure hose in both units means that neither offers an advantage in movement around the unit initially. With power cords measuring 35 ft, both units allow for an equivalent distance from an electrical outlet.
- Storage: With onboard storage included, both the GPW3000 and GPW2700 keep your nozzles and essential accessories neatly organized and readily accessible. Both washers provide a set of hooks, simplifying the process of storing their high-pressure hoses when not in use.
TL;DR
| Greenworks GPW3000 | Greenworks GPW2700 |
|---|---|
| |
|
|
| Buy on Amazon (opens in a new tab) | Buy on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
Show all offers | Show all offers |
Your review was very well organized and provided a good comparison between the 2700 and 3000. If possible, I would welcome the links for a longer blue hose and the aftermarket 3.5 mm nozzle.
Hello, Thanks for you very good review. You have great knowedge. Seems very little difference. The 2700 little less pressure and more G.P.M. Mike